About

I’m a researcher. A student of all sciences. I don’t base anything I believe off of preconceptions. If I say something that plays into a stereotype, you had better believe I’m going to have something to back it up from more than one angle. I may come off a bit sexist, because I’m waiting to meet a girl worth my time, and who can get over petty conceptions that other influences have place in her. Or who can carry a conversation and realize, it’s not personal. Who can realize that a discussion is not an argument towards one side or another. A Discussion is a conversation consisting of the good and bad points of the topic, the problems and solutions, and the respective hindrances that make up our reality. A discussion is designed to open the mind to more diverse ways of understanding the world around us, if the partner refuses to think about an idea or spouts the same repetitive phrase like an answer to a question they haven’t thought through, then inevitably the person cannot comprehend the discussion, and the conversation should be directed in such a manner as to allow this person more examples or rephrased sentences until they are able to comprehend, then the conversation may continue. This is the staple point where most theological discussions are lost, one person may not believe something because it cannot be proven, while another may say that there is proof enough evident. Logic in these situations is meaningless, for each person is acting on opinion rather than a collected assortment of sources. Not to mention if anyone is to win a theological argument, someone must en turn have their beliefs revalidated. This inevitably has left me with the urge to punch a few too many people, from both sexes, in the baby makers. I think that enough from me.